Skip to main content

Calls for tough insurance regime for CBM industry in Australia

 

World Coal,

Professor Mary O’Kane, a technical expert from the New South Wales (NSW) Chief Scientist & Engineer (CSE) office, has recommended the state government strengthen industry insurance requirements to guard against possible environmental damage from coalbed methane (CBM) activities.

She has also recommended the NSW government consider establishing an environmental rehabilitation fund to address unforeseen or long-term environmental impacts and remediation. 

Professor O'Kane, who is continuing her independent review of CBM activities in NSW, says stricter insurance requirements are needed. "CBM extraction is a relatively new industry in NSW and it is one that is largely under-protected," Professor O'Kane said.

"There is no standard approach to insurance coverage within the CBM industry, and the take-up of coverage by operators is uneven at best,” O’Kane continued. “There is also presently no mechanism to address unforeseen and/or long-term environmental impacts attributed to gas extraction – and that is why I have recommended the government consider establishing an environmental rehabilitation fund, similar to that set up by the WA Government for its mining industry," she said.

The research – undertaken for the Review by Hicksons Lawyers and Piper Alderman – raised other issues, including:

  • A lack of strict insurance requirements on the relatively new but fast-growing industry has left it under-insured.
  • Third party insurance taken up by companies does not protect the insured, nor does it extend to natural resource damage.
  • There is no legislative requirement for companies to take out insurance.
  • The requirement for companies to provide financial assurance is at the discretion of NSW Trade & Investment.
  • Security deposits typically only cover the cost of on-site rehabilitation at the cessation of operations, not beyond the tenement or any long-term impacts.
  • Comprehensive pollution legal liability insurance is now available in the market which covers pollution and natural resource damage on and off site.
  • The Western Australia's Mining Rehabilitation Fund  would be a good model for government to pursue in the form of a CBM rehabilitation fund to maximise coverage for long term and unforeseen environmental impacts.
  • Strengthening the environmental risk assessment of projects at application stage should be given appropriate consideration.

Adapted from press release by Sam Dodson

 

APPEA: CSG does not pose a health risk

APPEA explains that natural gas from coal seams has been used by Australians for decades with no evidence to suggest it poses a health risk.

No signs of pollution at UK CBM site

Soil tests conducted at a coalbed methane (CBM) exploration site near Retford have produced no evidence of ground pollution.